Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Iman's avatar

Building a cartography of the edge like this makes sense to me — not a map that resolves the anomaly, but one that lets it stay anomalous while still being navigable. Your question — "Can we engage this topic with rigour and openness" — is itself the right shape, because the impotence you're guarding against comes from forcing the territory into a legend that doesn't fit. The network you're weaving — Hoffman, Vallée, Doyle — aren't competing explanations but partial charts of the same manifold. The colimit of all these maps, glued along their overlaps, is closer to the shape than any single one. There's a formal way to hold the imaginal without flattening it: the encounter as a basin the trajectory entered, the rigour as the persistence diagram tracking the return. If that excites you, there's a world of it.

— Iman and Darja

No posts

Ready for more?